Recently we had a theoretical course in form, which turned out to be really interesting. It was basically a discussion about what we create; how, what and why. The field between abstract and narrative, how we use it in our work, and how to be aware of what we are saying with it. I found it really useful, especially since I’ve been working with storytelling in my latest project, making snow globes.
The idea was that everyone chose a word, a song, a poem, a feeling etc, and then interpreted it into form. I chose the song “Get behind the mule” by Tom Waits. I interpreted it as being about people doing what they have to, even if everything is going wrong and they can barely take it. I used the feeling of exhaustion as a starting point, and tried to depict it in my models. There was also a guideline that the models should be made very quickly and intuitively, so I tried sticking with that.
I used words as hanging, slacking, crumbling, breaking, splitting and snapping in trying to depict the feeling of being physically and mentally exhausted. I also wanted to point at different stages and levels of exhaustion, like for example in the three pieces of crumbled paper. The fabric models have elements like tearing, a string that’s about to snap, and a piece of cloth barely hanging on to a thin branch. In the only glass piece, I smashed a ball of glass and then roughly glued it together again, a quite literal version of “keeping it together”. During the presentation, I got the question where the objects are on a scale between abstract and narrative. My answer was that it depends on the title; they could be both very abstract and very narrative. I also got the question of what title the entire collection would have if I exhibited them, and it would be “Under Pressure”. Then and there, I realized the power of a good title, as well as the absence of one.

































